Tips & Tricks for Hosting Online Meetings and Events

It is now a cliché that Covid has caused more advances in the adoption of remote presence technology and videoconferencing as productivity tools than the industry’s marketing activities caused in the previous 10 years.

This has the potential to create large benefits, but like all technologies, has also the potential to create significant disadvantages, often due to people trying to do more with the system than it was intended to achieve. 

In the context of remote meetings by video conference, this often takes the form of assuming that people develop a relationship with each other just as well over video as they do in “real life”.  The reality is that, while it can be done, the relationships people form using video-only take longer to form, are not as deep and break down more easily than the relationships between groups that meet in person, even only occasionally. This can be important to understand, as particularly in governance contexts, the relationship between meeting members directly contributes to the meeting’s effectiveness.  Video calls let people fill in a speaker’s intent and motivation more than text-only or voice-only communication, but this is kick-started by having pre-existing face-to-face relationships.

Another disadvantage is that all the tips and hacks we have learned to make running meetings easier in a lifetime of face-to-face meetings, now need to be re-learned (or even discarded) to suit the digital medium our meetings now tend to use.  This article hopes to present some tips for running meetings and events online to mitigate this issue.  They are aimed at meeting organisers but hopefully will be of interest to others as well.  “Meetings and Events” is a large scope, though, and not all events will need the same level of attention.  Each meeting will have its own requirements for formality, record-keeping, interaction and relationship; and these requirements will translate into different ways to manage the specific meeting.

Planning and Preparation 

Hopefully, this is something you do for face-to-face meetings as well.  Because video communication leaves out a lot of the subliminal content we unconsciously take for granted for in-person meetings, good planning and pre-meeting communications are arguably even more important. 

  • Set up the meeting and invitation as far in advance of the meeting as you can, and configure it so that participants can join the meeting (at least to the waiting room) before the meeting and encourage them to check they can access the meeting with all the audio, video, sharing etc working as they expect.  For a presentation or seminar, you may even consider doing a “dry-run” with the presenters. 
  • Produce a “running sheet” for the event.  This is like an agenda, but is typically more detailed and focused on the production requirements, not the content.  It could indicate things like timings, backgrounds, and resources needed when things like notices need to be put in the chat, when videos need to be played etc. 

Minutes 

One thing I learnt as a consultant is that it is really, really hard to both run a meeting and take good notes.  Contrary to a lot of opinions expressed to me, this doesn’t get easier in an online context.  In fact, if you have to manage the technology as well, you are now trying to do 3 things at the same time instead of two. 

  • Appoint someone whose only job is to take notes.  If you need to do more than fire up the meeting and share a screen once or twice, appoint someone else to manage the technology.  If it’s even mildly complex, consider producing a running sheet for them. 
  • Consider using a software notetaker.  With the surge in AI that’s happening in the tech space just now, there are some significant advances in this space.  I’ve been playing with a Zoom plug-in called Fathom AI notetaker for a while and the results are impressive.  I initially considered it a good fit only for enterprise sales calls it now seems to be a good general-purpose tool.  At a meeting last week, I was blown away by the 2 sentence summaries it generated on the fly for each section of the meeting. 

Screen sharing

If you are sharing a document or a PowerPoint slide, consider logging into the meeting from a separate computer (no camera or microphone needed) and sharing the document from there.  Then you can Pin the screen or remove it as required.  You can also pin the document side by side with the speaker, giving a much better view of the speaker than Zoom’s default thumbnail view. 

Running the Meeting or Event 

  • When hosting a video call with a large group, try to ask specific questions to specific people, and use their names when doing so.  This establishes who will be answering the question and avoids the ever-awkward “No, you go ahead.  No, you!” situation. 
  • If you (or your technical delegate) need to share information in the Chat during the meeting, set all the information up beforehand in a document, then cut and paste it at the relevant time.  This saves getting it wrong at the psychological moment or forgetting.  Don’t forget to put the name and location of the file in the running sheet! 

If nothing else, consider these six golden rules for better video meetings, (adapted from a Trello™ blog post): 

  • Use video for strengthening existing relationships 
  • Have equipment that works – and test that it is still working before your meeting 
  • Look professional yourself and aim for a professional-looking delivery, flowing smoothly from topic to topic. 
  • Make sure everyone feels included 
  • Set up team rules to make video meetings more manageable – this can be just as simple as waiting till called on before speaking, but whatever the rule is, it needs to match the requirements and purpose of the meeting.  For example, if you are running a brainstorming meeting, preventing people from speaking till called on may be counterproductive. 

Church Management Systems

What do Breeze, Wild Apricot, Toucan Tech and Infoodle have in common?

They are all examples of the names chosen by the developers of specific examples of a – relatively – new type of software, Church Management Systems or ChMS.  Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that this type of software is enjoying a revival, as similar programs have been around for about as long as programmers have been involved in churches.  However, the current ChMS solutions are leveraging the commercial sector success of CMS solutions – Customer (or Client or Constituent) Management Systems.  Consequently, the underlying technology is very robust.  [Note: frustratingly, CMS is also used for Content Management System, a website solution component.  Some providers get around this by using CRM for Customer Relationship Management]

The underlying premise being all CMS systems (including ChMS’s) is that collecting all the data about one’s customers (or congregants) that can be accessed by all authorised parties in the organisation.  This leads to a number of benefits;

  • There is “one source of truth” – if Mrs Smith tells the door greeter that she has a new phone number, then (in theory – humans can still break the system) everybody else using the CMS can access that number as well. 
  • A centralised solution is also easier to keep backed up (and because it is a centralised solution, it is more critical to make sure it is backed up).
  • A benefit for larger organisations is that if the ChMS records details of all interactions, then if a contact makes a call to the office, then it doesn’t matter who answers, the answerer able to bring themselves very quickly up to date with the context and requirements for that contact.  In a church context, privacy and confidentiality requirements need to be observed, but the principle still applies, especially for administrative matters.
  • ChMS solutions usually support managed communications and automation.  Need to send out a reminder for that special Sunday School event?  Email the pew bulletin to non-attendees?  These types of communications have the potential to make people feel wanted and included but are typically not done because they are too time intensive.  CRMs can make this type of communication happen for the cost of a few hours of upfront set-up and some regular procedures to ensure details are captured and kept up to date.
  • ChMS solutions can keep track of skills, qualifications and expertise held by members and staff.  If a job comes up that needs specific skills or qualifications, you can quickly find out who has those skills.  If a qualification needs to be renewed from time to time, you can have reminders sent to relevant people when renewal action is required.  You can organise all your contacts into groups so that sending an email to the Parish Council, to the entire congregation, or to Homegroup members are all just a couple of clicks.  Most ChMSs will take care of privacy issues for you by hiding everyone else’s email address.
  • Safeguarding and protecting the vulnerable – these features have become particularly important during the pandemic.  Most ChMSs provide some level of “Check-in” capability to allow you to know exactly who was at a given event, track attendee numbers against a limit and allow follow-up to attendees – whether to say, “Thank you for coming” or, “We’re sorry to advise that one of the attendees has tested positive”, as the case may be.  We also live in a society that is increasingly paranoid about the safety of children.  Civil requirements for managing children’s groups are becoming increasingly complex and are likely to become mandatory in time.  Most ChMSs can offer at least minimal solutions to assist manage these requirements, ranging from Check-in/Check-out capability, recording who dropped off or picked up a given child, restricting who is allowed to pick up a given child, to recording allergies or medical conditions and specific first-aid protocols for individuals.  To my mind, it is these types of features that make the most compelling case for churches to adopt ChMSs at the moment.
  • Overall, the benefits of ChMS can be summed up as releasing time spent on administrative tasks for missional and relational activities.  Churches have a large volunteer work component, but it is decreasing over time, so if there is a way we can shift our volunteer resources from administration to strategically focused activity, there should be a significant benefit.

Considerations

Modules, modules and more modules!  ChMS vendors seem to love modules.  The typical product structure is a core module with at least the CRM functions and a number of optional add-on modules (usually at additional cost) providing additional features such as Accounting functions, Donor management, Service planning, Attendance Tracking, Online Giving etc.  Make sure you get all the features you need and that you understand exactly what that costs.

International Law.  If you are looking at Accounting or Donor management or similar features, make sure that the solution you are thinking of complies with NZ requirements rather than US or EU requirements.

Buy a system with room to grow.  Church management systems can help you grow your ministry, so be sure to buy a system that can handle more than your current needs.

Think twice about building your own system.  It may seem tempting to build your own church management software to save a little money, but in the long run, you will end up spending more.  You will likely not be able to migrate easily to another solution or share data with others if you take this path.  Leave the software to the experts and focus on what you do best: building your congregation.

Office 365 for non-profits

Those of you that have anything to do with the Methodist Church of NZ may have seen in the March eMessenger an article encouraging parishes to use Microsoft Office 365 for free instead paying for Microsoft Office. “Free” is always an attractive price-point for churches and other charities, so let’s look at this offer a bit more closely.

This is not a Methodist specific offer. Microsoft has a global philanthropic program where they donate licences to their own products to qualified charities around the world, administered by a global charity called TechSoup Global. The criteria for eligibility is “Non-profit and non-governmental organizations that are recognized as charitable organizations in their respective countries. Eligible organizations must also operate on a not-for-profit basis and have a mission to benefit the local community […]”. Microsoft has an Eligibility webpage with detailed explanation of eligibility criteria and links to country specific eligibility criteria.

Because the licencing is essentially a donation from Microsoft, there are some conditions attached. Firstly, the donated software must be used to further the charitable purpose of the done organisation and cannot be primarily for personal use. Reasonable ancillary use is accepted, but organisations should endeavour to ensure that the software doesn’t become a volunteer’s primary [personal] e-mail address, for example. Microsoft has a specific guideline on whether volunteer’s are eligible for Nonprofit licences; the volunteer is accountable for specific activities and results, the volunteer’s role is year-round on-going (or seasonal recurring annually) and the volunteer will not use the software for activities related to personal gain. Use by employee’s should be governed by a “reasonable use” policy. Secondly, I understand that as a donated item, charities should be recording the full commercial value of the software as a “donation in-kind”. (If there is someone reading this who can clarify this, I’d appreciate hearing from you.)

So what can one get for free? In the context of Office 365 services, the answer is 2 specific plans, “Nonprofit Business Essentials” and “Nonprofit E1”. The equivalent commercial versions of these plans are currently worth $9.00 per user per month and $11.90 per user per month (plus GST), so the magnitude of the donation is quite significant. The 2 plans are functionally quite similar – the “Business” plans have limitations in the number of users, migration options and some back-of-house functions that make it more suitable for smaller organisations.

The key components included in each license are as follows;

  • Email service with 50GB mailbox, calendar and contacts
  • OneDrive file-sharing with 1TB storage (which means capability to access anywhere from any device)
  • Unlimited online meetings with HD video, web-conferencing and messaging
  • Organisation Intranet (Sharepoint)
  • Team workspace and collaboration tools (Teams)

So, if you are at all familiar with traditional Office, you will be wondering where Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Publisher have gone. Well, they are there – sort of. The free plans only include the Online version of these applications. There is nothing wrong with this – while you wouldn’t want to write your thesis paper with the online versions, they are quite capable, though a little different in some usability respects. But, at the risk of some over-simplification, you may need to be online while you edit. To my mind, ideally you would want your main computer to have Desktop Office program versions installed and just use the online versions for a quick review or last minute tweaks when you are away from your computer.

In the final analysis, the Desktop Office programs are also available through Microsoft’s non-profit program, heavily discounted compared to commercial pricing, but not free. They are available either as a DVD that you can install, or as a different Office365 plan (probably the Nonprofit E3 plan for most) where a monthly per user fee gives access to the desktop versions as well as the online. This decision can be made on a user by user basis – licence plans can generally be mixed and matched to match individual requirements. For example, you can have one user on E1 with no desktop office, another on E1 with desktop office from another source and another on E3 with desktop office available from the cloud. Almost all software products are transitioning to cloud based licenses, so I suspect it is only a matter of time before this becomes the only option available.

As always, happy to address any questions you may have. Contact me at dct@dct.org.nz or via the editor. This article is published at www.dct.org.nz (and all the links are clickable there?).

Links

[Links correct at time of publication; please note they may no longer be active.]

Author - Peter Lane

Peter Lane is Principal Consultant at System Design & Communication Services and has over 30-years’ experience with Technology systems.  We invite your questions, suggestions and ideas for articles.  These can be submitted either through the editor or by email to dct@dct.org.nz.  We also operate a website focused on building a community of people who are interested in improving the way we can use technology located at www.dct.org.nz.